You've got a website. It's fine. It's "good enough."

But is it costing you deals?

Last year I talked with a Maximo consultant who'd just landed a call with a mid-size utility. Good conversation. They were interested. Then they asked for his website. What he had didn't say much: no real detail on what he'd actually done, who he'd done it for, or how he worked.

He didn't lose that deal because of his expertise. He had 20+ years of it. He lost momentum because his site was good enough to exist, but not good enough to answer what the buyer actually wanted to know: what he'd done, who he'd done it for, and whether he actually understood the problem keeping them up at night. By the time the utility's team went looking to confirm what they'd heard, they found nothing solid enough to act on. The conversation cooled.

This is more common than people admit

A lot of sharp Maximo and EAM consultants are one-person shops or small teams. They're heads down delivering for clients, managing implementations, handling support tickets, keeping the actual work moving. The website just never makes it to the top of the list, or it gets built once and never revisited.

I understand that completely. I've run a one-person content marketing practice for years, and I know exactly how easy it is to let your own visibility slide while you take care of everyone else's.

The gap costs you two ways

Some buyers find you before you ever talk to them, through a search, a referral, or one of your own marketing campaigns. If your site doesn't answer their questions at that stage, you don't make the shortlist. You're out of the running before the conversation even starts.

Others get you on a call first, like what they hear, and go looking for confirmation afterward. If your site doesn't back up what you told them, the deal doesn't die outright, but it loses the thing every deal needs at that stage: momentum.

Either way, a "good enough" website that doesn't do this specific job is quietly costing you deals you never even hear about.

A fixed option for exactly that gap

That's why I built a basic website package specifically for Maximo and EAM consultants and firms who need to close this gap without turning it into a six-month project.

It's a 4-page site: Home, About, Services, Contact. Live in 2 to 3 weeks. $1,500 flat.

It's not a template with your logo dropped in. I've spent 30 years inside the Maximo and EAM ecosystem, and I'm an IBM Champion in this space. That background shapes the structure and messaging of the site itself. Asset managers, plant engineers, and IT directors evaluate a potential partner differently than a general small-business buyer would, and the site is built around how that evaluation actually happens, not generic small-business copy pulled from a template library.

You also own the site outright once it's live. No ongoing dependency, no lock-in.

The real cost isn't the website

The real cost is what happens in the gap before you have one that works: good conversations that stall out, and shortlists you never even land on, for reasons that have nothing to do with your ability to do the work.

If your website isn't doing that job for you, that's worth fixing before it costs you the next deal.

See the full details on the website package →